Contents
Executive Summary
Foreword
- Introduction
- Korean Economy
Introduction
Economic Model
Growth Dynamics
Analysis of GDP Value-Added
Profit Failure
Capital Markets
Exports and FX Rates
Conclusions
- Focus on Employment
- Focus on Small and Medium-Sized Companies
- Factors of the Economy
- Factor Markets
- Crippled Markets
- Actions Needed
- Implementation
- Potential Results
APPENDIX
Appendix 1 : About the Authors and Sponsors
Appendix 2 : Actions Needed by Economic Category
Appendix 3 : The Factor Matrix for Labour
Appendix 4 : Starting Phase II
| Background to the Report | We started work on the One Million Jobs Report in April 1998
to focus policy attention on value-added employment as the single most important issue in
the economy. There were five main reasons:
We recognize that not all the ideas in this report are new. There have been many valuable critiques of the Korean economy over the last few years, particularly including those by Booz-Allen & Hamilton and McKinsey in the last twelve months. The Booz-Allen & Hamilton report identified strategic issues related to competitiveness and the dangers of being caught in an economic vise between Japan and China. The McKinsey report identified low productivity in Korea and argued that the service sector should take up the majority of future employment. |
| This One Million Jobs Report focuses on value-added job
creation. The report identifies that value-added employment creation, whether in
agriculture, manufacturing or services, is what the economy urgently needs. It identifies that small and medium businesses in services, manufacturing and agriculture are the engine of growth for employment, and therefore the engine of growth for the economy in the 21st century. The report emphasizes that small and medium industry do not receive sufficient government attention in Korea today, unlike in the past before the era of dominant chaebols. And the report recognizes that regulations in Korea are endemic like a disease, not only obstructing the full efficiency of the economy but also destroying capital. |
Historical Perspective
| Learn from History | The study starts with an analysis of the course of Korean economic development since 1970. Studying these long time-series data provides a fresh perspective on the issues that have been gradually building up in the economy. |
| Sources of Value Added | This chart represents the sources of GDP by industry sector,
from 1970 to the present, and shows that agriculture and manufacturing have declined in
importance to the economy, while the service sector has long been the most important
component of GDP: Diagram EX-1
|
| Rewards of Value-Added | Analyzing the rewards of GDP provides significant insight
into the long-term health of the economy: Diagram EX-2
|
| Profit Failure | If we look at GDP for the Korean economy and its two primary
components, Compensation (wages) and Operating Surplus (profits) on an index basis since
1970, we see that a clear imbalance has emerged, particularly since 1988: Diagram EX-3
Operating Surplus (profit) is clearly underperforming the economy. And as a consequence, is holding back overall economic growth. |
| Lost Opportunity | If profit growth had been achieved in line with compensation
growth the potential of growth rate of Korean GDP would have been 9.4% per annum instead
of 8.1%. Diagram EX-4 Past GDP Growth Potential ?
|